Contact Us

We welcome useful feedback from readers, researchers, and mystery fans. You can contact Occult World Cup to report a broken link, suggest a correction, recommend a public source, ask about the tournament interface, or discuss a responsible collaboration. The more specific your message is, the easier it is for us to review and improve the archive.

What To Include In A Correction

If you believe an article contains a factual mistake, please include the page URL, the exact paragraph or claim, and a public source that supports the correction. We prioritize corrections that improve dates, locations, attribution, terminology, or the distinction between documented history and later retellings. We do not add private accusations, personal contact details, or claims that could identify uninvolved individuals.

Source Suggestions

Source suggestions are welcome when they are public, stable, and relevant to the topic. Useful examples include public archives, newspaper databases, museum pages, academic discussions, official reports, interviews, and well-preserved historical summaries. A short note explaining why the source matters is more valuable than a long unsorted list of links.

Technical And Accessibility Issues

If the tournament does not load, a mystery card links to the wrong page, a mobile layout becomes hard to read, or an image blocks text, tell us the device, browser, and page where the issue happened. Occult World Cup is designed to be readable on phones as well as desktop screens, so mobile reports are especially helpful.

Partnership And Advertising Questions

Occult World Cup may consider collaborations that fit the site as informational entertainment. We do not accept requests to publish unsafe instructions, targeted harassment, fabricated testimony, or paid claims presented as research. Advertising support must remain separate from editorial judgment.

Reader Experience Reports

Some readers write to describe a personal experience that resembles an existing mystery. We appreciate thoughtful messages, but we handle them carefully. A personal story is not automatically treated as verified evidence, and we will not publish identifying details without clear permission and editorial review. If you send an experience report, focus on the date range, general region, what you observed, and what ordinary explanations you already considered.

Please avoid sending private addresses, names of uninvolved people, phone numbers, medical details, or accusations against a specific person. Mystery archives can be interesting without exposing people who did not ask to be part of a public story. If a report involves danger, harassment, or a real-world emergency, contact the appropriate local authority rather than relying on this site.

What Happens After A Message Arrives

Messages are reviewed for relevance, safety, and usefulness. A broken link can usually be fixed quickly. A factual correction may require source checking. A new topic suggestion may be saved for future expansion if it fits the encyclopedia. A private experience report may remain unpublished if it cannot be responsibly summarized. We would rather publish slowly than turn uncertain material into a misleading claim.

When we update a page because of a reader note, the goal is to improve clarity: better dates, clearer attribution, safer wording, stronger source separation, or a more useful related-reading path. We do not guarantee that every suggestion will be accepted, but specific, sourced, and respectful messages are the most helpful.